<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smoke &#038; Mirrors: NHL Spin-o-rama</title>
	<link>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14</link>
	<description>:: BroadStreetBully.com - All hockey. All fights. All the time. ::</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 08:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Spartan</title>
		<link>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-16</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-16</guid>
					<description>I agree that the blatant obstruction, holding, hooking, high sticking etc should be called....and I hope that the theory is something like &quot;we have to re-train these players and we can do that by calling EVERYTHING...then we'll back off a bit.&quot;  

What a lot of NHL/AHL players are worried about is letting players with no balls become a dominant factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the blatant obstruction, holding, hooking, high sticking etc should be called&#8230;.and I hope that the theory is something like &#8220;we have to re-train these players and we can do that by calling EVERYTHING&#8230;then we&#8217;ll back off a bit.&#8221;  </p>
<p>What a lot of NHL/AHL players are worried about is letting players with no balls become a dominant factor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jnacci</title>
		<link>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-15</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-15</guid>
					<description>That call against Charra for &quot;holding&quot; Lindros (clip on this site - &quot;No Touching&quot;) would have been a joke in the past ... and apparently it is a joke to The Bully.  But I like them calling that a penalty.  I have no problem with them cracking down STRINGENTLY on obstruction, holding, hooking and especially high sticking.  

20 powerplays a night is what it might take to teach the players and coaches to play a more explosive style of hockey.  

If Charra doesn't have the option to grab at Lindros as he crosses the line (with or without the puck) there is a better chance he will go for a knockout open ice hit.  OR, in the case of that particular play he would have to wheel around and chase Lindros into the corner and rub him out on the glass.  I don't know about you but I would rather see that happen than trying to hold him.  I believe calling those particular obstruction-type infractions will make the game faster tougher and more explosive.  The NHL has got to stick with there plan this time.

But with that said there is one rule I don't want them to call closely.  For the love of Clean Hard-Nosed Hockey ... the Instigator Rule should be called very rarely (or removed entirely).  If you high stick someone on purpose or carelessly you will get a rest in the penalty box or maybe a suspension or small fine.  In the old days if you did that, you got to live with the constant fear of getting your eye blackened or some teeth knocked out.  If you ask me, that's more of a deterrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That call against Charra for &#8220;holding&#8221; Lindros (clip on this site - &#8220;No Touching&#8221;) would have been a joke in the past &#8230; and apparently it is a joke to The Bully.  But I like them calling that a penalty.  I have no problem with them cracking down STRINGENTLY on obstruction, holding, hooking and especially high sticking.  </p>
<p>20 powerplays a night is what it might take to teach the players and coaches to play a more explosive style of hockey.  </p>
<p>If Charra doesn&#8217;t have the option to grab at Lindros as he crosses the line (with or without the puck) there is a better chance he will go for a knockout open ice hit.  OR, in the case of that particular play he would have to wheel around and chase Lindros into the corner and rub him out on the glass.  I don&#8217;t know about you but I would rather see that happen than trying to hold him.  I believe calling those particular obstruction-type infractions will make the game faster tougher and more explosive.  The NHL has got to stick with there plan this time.</p>
<p>But with that said there is one rule I don&#8217;t want them to call closely.  For the love of Clean Hard-Nosed Hockey &#8230; the Instigator Rule should be called very rarely (or removed entirely).  If you high stick someone on purpose or carelessly you will get a rest in the penalty box or maybe a suspension or small fine.  In the old days if you did that, you got to live with the constant fear of getting your eye blackened or some teeth knocked out.  If you ask me, that&#8217;s more of a deterrant.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Spartan</title>
		<link>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-14</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.broadstreetbully.com/blog/archives/14#comment-14</guid>
					<description>The NHL's game is no longer a game of contact.  It is, as someone said, a game of collisions.  It is a game that will drive the tough guys out.  I dont mean goons...I mean tough guys.  There is no drama....it's indoor soccer on ice.  I am a long time fan of all levels of hockey and what the NHL has created is not the game I love.   I'm all for taking out the clutching and grabbing and the complete neutralization of speed.  By enforcing the rules the NHL said they were going to enforce two years ago (and didnt) along with the elimination of the red line...the game would be the one we'd all like to see.  Speed is rewarded, but tough play is not penalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NHL&#8217;s game is no longer a game of contact.  It is, as someone said, a game of collisions.  It is a game that will drive the tough guys out.  I dont mean goons&#8230;I mean tough guys.  There is no drama&#8230;.it&#8217;s indoor soccer on ice.  I am a long time fan of all levels of hockey and what the NHL has created is not the game I love.   I&#8217;m all for taking out the clutching and grabbing and the complete neutralization of speed.  By enforcing the rules the NHL said they were going to enforce two years ago (and didnt) along with the elimination of the red line&#8230;the game would be the one we&#8217;d all like to see.  Speed is rewarded, but tough play is not penalized.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
